True peak: why your songs should never peak above -1 dBTP

It is the recommendation of many streaming services, as well as many pro mastering engineers, that you master your songs to peak no louder than -1 dBTP (-1 decibel true peak). But what does that mean, and how do we achieve it? In this lesson, we’ll break down what true peak means, why your songs should peak no higher than -1 decibel true peak, and how to use true peak limiters and true peak metering. That way, you can master your tracks to sound their best when they’re released.

Before we go any further, if you want to make better music in your home studio, then be sure to download your free home studio bundle here (EQ cheat sheet, compression cheat sheet, & vocal guide).

What is true peak in audio?

To understand what ‘true peak’ means, it helps to think about what happens to songs once they’ve left your DAW and have been released to the world. When releasing music for streaming, digital download, or CD, your songs exist as digital files. To hear those songs, the digital files need to be converted from digital to analog. The digital to analog conversion carried out by your phone, laptop, Bluetooth speaker, etc, can result in changes in the level of the audio as it converts the stepped digital samples to a smooth analog wave.

If you have a song that is mastered to peak at 0 dBFS, this could present a problem. That’s because the analog reconstruction of two consecutive digital samples peaking at 0 dBFS may result in an analog wave that peaks higher than either of the samples. This creates what is known as an ‘inter-sample peak‘. Some high-end audio equipment will have headroom to compensate. But the result on many consumer playback systems will be audible clipping.

Many meters detect only ‘sample peaks’, which represent the level of the highest digital sample. A true peak meter, however, is designed to indicate when inter-sample peaks are likely to occur. Similarly, a true peak limiter is designed to apply limiting based on when inter-sample peaks are likely to occur. We’ll talk more about both of those shortly.

dBTP for streaming

Because a true peak meter is designed to indicate when inter-sample peaks may occur, it may seem safe to assume that you can master your songs to peak at 0 dBTP… So why then do many mastering engineers and streaming platforms recommend that your songs peak no higher than -1 dBTP?

Well, the majority of streaming platforms encode your original lossless files (e.g. WAV) into data-compressed file formats (e.g. AAC). This is done to save data when streaming. The processing used to achieve this is another instance in which level increases can occur. True peak meters aim to anticipate such changes. But it’s not uncommon to see a track that was mastered to peak at -1 dBTP, peaking higher than that once encoded to a data compressed format. As such, it’s important to keep 1dB of true peak headroom. This compensates for such level changes, minimizing the risk of clipping.

It’s worth noting that the louder it is that a song is mastered, and/or the lower the data rate of the encoded file, the greater the risk of clipping. As such, Spotify recommends that if your song has an integrated loudness of more than -14 LUFS, then it should peak no higher than -2 dBTP. Personally, however, I find -1 dBTP to be adequate as long as your short-term loudness is no higher than -10 LUFS. Learn how to do that, and more about the different LUFS measurements, here.

A useful way of checking to see if clipping is likely when your song is encoded to a data compressed format is to use a plugin like ‘Codec Toolbox‘ by Sonnox, or ‘Codec Preview‘ in Ozone. Such plugins allow you to audition different codecs and check for any potential clipping that might occur.

How do you control true peak?

So, how do you ensure that you master your songs to peak no higher than -1 dBTP? Well, the peak level of a song is usually controlled through the use of a limiter at the mastering stage. Some limiters apply true peak limiting by default. Others limit only sample peaks. Some let you toggle between sample peak and true peak. Then there are those that limit sample peaks, but their meters let you know when inter-sample peaks may occur.

Whichever of these limiter types you have, start with the limiter’s ceiling/output set to -1dB. Then, monitor the true peak meter at the loudest part of the song. Some DAWs have true peak meters built-in. If yours doesn’t, the Youlean Loudness Meter has a great free version that measures both True Peak and LUFS, both of which are essential for mastering. Even with a true peak limiter’s ceiling set to -1 dB, a true peak meter may give a reading higher than -1 dBTP. If you’re using a sample peak limiter set to -1dB, then the true peak meter’s reading may be quite a bit higher than -1 dBTP. In either case, the required process is the same. Pull the limiter’s ceiling down to a level that ensures that your true peak meter doesn’t detect any peaks higher than -1dBTP.

Some people don’t like the sound of true peak limiters. That’s ok! As long as you’re using a true peak meter, you can ensure that your songs don’t peak higher than -1 dBTP by using either true peak limiters or sample peak limiters alike.

What should my true peak be?

So, let’s recap… When mastering songs, be sure to measure their peak level using a true peak meter. Adjust your limiter’s ceiling/output to ensure that your true peak meter detects peaks no higher than -1 dBTP. This gives you the best chance of producing masters which will not clip when played on consumer playback systems. Peaking no higher than -1 dBTP also means that you’ll meet the recommendation of the streaming platforms. Plus, it gives you the best chance of producing songs that will not clip when encoded for streaming.

Do you release music for online streaming? If so, do you make sure that your songs peak no louder than -1 dBTP? Leave your thoughts, comments, and questions below.


FREE GUIDES: Get the best results from EQ, compression, and vocals

7 thoughts on “True peak: why your songs should never peak above -1 dBTP

  1. I’m trying to get my true peak down to -3, -4 in my mix without having to decrease every track in order to achieve this, is there a way you like? I’ve heard of the VCA master route but can’t remember how to do it. I know I could just decrease the master fader to that level but I’m assuming there’s a better way. This mix is for my mastering engineer who likes to receive my files at that level. Thanks

    1. Hey Galand. I think that lowering the level on the master fader is fine, but if you’d rather go the VCA Master route, then let me jog your memory on how to do that:

      1. Select all tracks you want to turn down and click Command + G (on a mac) to create a group, then click OK.
      2. Then go to Track > New, and select VCA Master from the second drop down box, then click Create.
      3. In the I/O section on the VCA fader, select the group.

      I hope this helps!

      Best wishes, Alex.

      1. Thank you Alex. Trying to respond again, the last comment I tried said it detected spam and now I’m not seeing it. Would you day there’s much of a difference between lowering the master fader and using the VCA method??

  2. Hi I note that some of my songs can achieve -14lufs -1true peak using real instruments.
    But others with more hi mid, ie,strats and Hammond keyboards really suffer. I get -03 true peak at – 16 lufs. Is this a known part of lufs?
    Cheers Bob

    1. Hi Bob, thank you for your question.

      What you’re saying makes sense. LUFS are designed to measure loudness in a way which is similar to human hearing, so it would certainly make sense that the frequency content of your tracks would play a role in the LUFS value.

      I hope this helps!

  3. I find this stuff very interesting – as an amateur musician producing breaks / progressive house etc. I am mixing quite loud and often come up against true peak readings that are “too high”. But when I look at artists who are leaders in the electronic genre (Jam & Spoon / Sultan & Shephard / Booka Shade) they often have peaks way over mine! For example there’s a track by Joris Voorn in which true peak goes over 4dB! And I am referencing their AIFF files here by the way – not MP3s. Why is it that they release these tracks in the knowledge that they are clearly over the limit? Is it because they are solely focussed on higher end reproduction and club playback? I am always torn between doing the “correct thing” or wanting to emulate the best producers out there (for me anyway).

    1. Hey Owain, thanks a lot for your comment.

      It certainly could be that some artists produce music with an expectation that it will be played through high-end playback systems. It could also be that, at the time that the music was produced, the ability to measure inter-sample peaks or to use true peak limiters wasn’t an option. That was certainly the case when I first started. I only had a peak limiter, and the general advice I was taught back then was to master all the way up to -0.3dBFS. I’m sure that if I measured some of the tracks that I produced back then with a true peak meter today, they’d be over -1dBTP. For a period of time, music was also produced to be ‘competitively loud’, which you could argue is now less of a consideration due to loudness normalization on streaming platforms. Of course, you could also argue that loudness is an important stylistic element in certain genres. So there are many factors at play! I think that it would be really interesting to look into whether any of your favourite producers, who produced really loud masters in the past, have changed their approaches at all in recent years in light of true peak metering, loudness normalization in streaming, etc.

      On a practical note, personally, I like to know that I’ve done all I can to reduce the risk of clipping when the songs are played on consumer playback systems or encoded for streaming. So for me, peaking no higher than -1dBTP is the best practise. But, if you feel that you get closer to the sound that you want by going over -1dBTP, then go for it. My advice would be to audition your songs as lossy codecs, and to listen to them on the kinds of playback systems that you think people are likely to listen to your music on, and base your decision on what you hear.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *